Thursday, April 3, 2014

Day 3: Roger Zelazny haiku

Josh called Nine Princes
Weakest of the Amber books?
Least Amberish, though.

This ties in to something I said during my original piece on Nine Princes in Amber. I suggested that I thought it was the worst of the original Amber books. I've since reconsidered that (I'd rank them Avalon, Oberon, Nine Princes, Unicorn, Chaos), but it still has a very different feel to it. It's not irreconcilable with the rest of the series, but the tone and the language are different in the later installments.

TVtropes has a page on this phenomenon. They call it Early Installment Weirdness. And the simplest explanation is almost certainly the correct one. Zelazny made up Amber as he went along, discarding elements that he didn't like or didn't work, codifying what was Amber and what wasn't as the series progressed.

I had started a post on the thematic differences between 9P and the rest of the books, but never completed it, as it seemed like too much of a niche project, even for a site like this. There is more of an emphasis on probability (Flora, in reference to Carmella: "I have decided that it is improbable that she will answer the door") that never reappears, Rebma never plays a large role again, we never see another creature created out of the Shadows like Morgenstern. (Merlin finds a comparable horse and his comments imply Corwin's Star and Benedict's horse, whose name escapes me (Glendenning?) are creatures of a similar nature.) It's unclear if Julian literally created Morgenstern out of shadow and we never see such an act of creation throughout the rest of the series, or if Corwin was describing the act of finding him in shadow with very unusual language.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Day 2: Roger Zelazny haiku



Jarry Dark, Coldworld
Catform, can never quite catch
the little red dot.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Another Brick in the Wall: Prettying Up Amanda Waller

Until recently, Amanda Waller was one of those niche characters only known to hardcore nerds. I wouldn't go so far as to describe myself as a "fan" of Amanda Waller, but I tended to enjoy her when she showed up, because she was unique.

First, a little context. I've long been of the opinion that Bane, the Batman villain, tells the Batman story better than Batman does.

My posts usually degenerate into a word salad of nerd rage where Batman is concerned, but I'm going to forego that this time, save to observe that it's only in the world of comic books that a brilliant, handsome and athletic man with a doting guardian and a trust fund big enough to travel the world in order to learn esoteric disciplines from far flung masters is considered in any way "disadvantaged".

Sure, Batman crafted himself into someone who could fight shoulder to shoulder with people who bench press cars and shoot death rays out of their eyes. Bane did the same thing, even beating Batman at his own game. And he rose from humbler origins to do it.

Consider, then, Amanda Waller. A single mother, a widow, with several children, some of whom died on the streets. A black woman who lived in public housing all her life. Short, fat, ugly, poor. And yet, within a period of a few years, she managed to claw her way to the top of the political arena, to the shadowy corridors where the true power brokers dwell. She lives every day as a battle and faces it with the kind of iron determination Green Lanterns can only envy.

(Also, it's a crime against humanity that Amanda Waller was in the Green Lantern movie, but not as the Green Lantern.)

She is the greyest of the grey. She lives in a world with no place for doubt or scruple. She is best known for running a team of supervillain field operatives, each with a bomb in his head to ensure compliance. She reminds me of a quote by Roger Zelazny, of which Corwin said of himself: "In the mirrors of the many judgments, my hands are the color of blood. I am a part of the evil that exists in the world and in Shadow. I sometime fancy myself an evil which exists to oppose other evils...and on that Great Day of which prophets speak but in which they do not truly believe, on that day when the world is completely cleansed of evil, then I, too, will go down into darkness, swallowing curses. Perhaps even sooner than that, I now judge. But whatever . . . Until that time, I shall not wash my hands nor let them hang useless."

She's a fascinating counterpart to vigilante heroes who break the law in the service of the greater good. She does the same thing. She just draws the line in a different place.

Let's talk about the way she looks, because I think that's as important a component to her identity as anything. Some pictures.

This is Amanda Waller.







This is not.






No less an authority than John Ostrander agrees*, “I think the changes made in her appearance are misguided. There were and are reasons why she looked the way she did. I wanted her to seem formidable and visually unlike anyone else out there. Making her young and svelte and sexy loses that. She becomes more like everyone else. She lost part of what made her unique."

Heck, I certainly understand the appeal. All things being equal, most people would prefer to look at a person they find attractive, rather than a person that they don't. That's nearly a tautology. Part of the reason I initially steered away from Arrow was that the promotional material made it look like a typical CW Teen show, where everyone is blandly and homogeneously attractive.

I don't believe that adaptations should require rigid adherence to the source material. If Harry Potter had been given blond hair for the films, I think I would have found such a change pointless, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that it ruined the character.

Amanda Waller is different. Her disadvantages are multiplicative, meaning that, as hard as it is for a minority woman to get ahead, it's exponentially harder for a portly, lower class, unattractive minority woman.

It's not just that Amanda Waller has consistently been portrayed as a far older woman with a very different body type, it's that if Amanda Waller looked like Addai-Robinson, she would never have had the experiences that were so central to her character.

Like I said, I don't require slavish adherence to canon. The medium is the message, after all. What works for comic books might not translate to television. However, at this point, she has so little in common with her namesake that the story would probably be better served by substituting an original character who plays a similar role, swapping a Talisa Maegyr for a Jeyne Westerling, so to speak.





* Though I suppose, given the circumstances, that I'm agreeing with him, rather than he's agreeing with me.

Day 1: Roger Zelazny haiku



Assholes pretending
to be gods in outer space?
Lord of Light, clearly.

The Third Annual Roger Zelazny Haiku-athon begins

I began the original Zelazny Haiku month on something of a lark. I had noticed that Timyin Tin and Archie exchanged haiku during their fight, and I thought it would be fun to get write one Roger Zelazny-themed haiku a day for the next month. (April is National Poetry Month, but I didn't know that at the time I began this exercise)

I did, and I enjoyed it and I came back a year later for the second act. This time, other people got in on it, offering haiku as corrections, rebuttals or amendments to mine. I really enjoyed that and hope we continue the tradition.

I'll try to have the day's haiku up by 6:00 PM Eastern time each day (or earlier, should I have one ready before I leave for work). I hope you enjoy reading them.